Hofling’s Hospital Experiment of Obedience

Hofling’s Hospital Experiment of Obedience is a classic study in social psychology that investigated the degree to which nurses in a hospital would obey an authority figure, even when doing so meant violating ethical and professional standards. The study, conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram’s student Charles Hofling in 1966, had significant implications for our understanding of obedience to authority and the potential consequences of blindly following orders.

Background

The experiment was conducted in the context of the healthcare system, where nurses are often in positions of authority and responsibility. The study was designed to investigate how nurses would respond when they were ordered by a doctor to administer a drug that exceeded the hospital’s recommended dosage limit. The study aimed to shed light on the extent to which authority figures could influence individuals to act in ways that were contrary to their moral and ethical values.

The Experiment

The experiment involved the use of a confederate doctor, who called nurses on the phone and instructed them to administer an unknown drug to a patient. The drug was called “Astroten” and was not listed in the hospital’s drug manual. The dosage of the drug exceeded the maximum recommended limit, and the package had a warning label stating that the drug should not be given to patients who were taking certain other medications.

The nurses who received the phone call were not informed that they were participating in an experiment and were led to believe that the doctor was a real physician. The experiment was conducted in a hospital in the northeastern United States and involved 22 nurses.

Results

The results of the study were alarming. Out of the 22 nurses who were tested, 21 were willing to administer the drug, despite the fact that doing so violated the hospital’s rules and the nurses’ professional code of ethics. The only nurse who refused to administer the drug was the one who had previously received training on ethical issues in nursing.

Moreover, the nurses did not take any steps to verify the identity of the doctor or the drug’s dosage and potential side effects. They also did not consult with their supervisors or colleagues, who could have provided guidance on how to handle the situation.

Implications

Hofling’s experiment had significant implications for our understanding of obedience to authority and the consequences of blindly following orders. The study demonstrated that individuals could be influenced by authority figures to act in ways that were contrary to their moral and ethical values, even in situations that posed potential harm to others.

The experiment also highlighted the importance of professional training and education in preparing individuals to make ethical decisions in complex situations. The nurse who had received training on ethical issues was the only one who refused to administer the drug, highlighting the crucial role of education in promoting ethical decision-making.

Moreover, the study had practical implications for the healthcare system, where the potential for harm to patients is high. The results of the study suggested that healthcare professionals needed to be aware of the potential for obedience to authority to lead to unethical behavior and take steps to prevent it.

Conclusion

Hofling’s Hospital Experiment of Obedience is a classic study in social psychology that demonstrated the extent to which individuals could be influenced by authority figures to act in ways that were contrary to their moral and ethical values. The study had significant implications for our understanding of obedience to authority and the potential consequences of blindly following orders.

The experiment highlighted the importance of professional training and education in promoting ethical decision-making and the need for healthcare professionals to be aware of the potential for obedience to authority to lead to unethical behavior. The study remains relevant today, as it continues to inform discussions on ethics, professionalism, and the role of authority in shaping behavior.

error: Content is protected !!